The artist was not charged,given his photos back and allowed to display.So I reckon that the pics where not as pornographic as people made them out to be and to the eyes of the law they are fine?????????and still classified as art.
Yep, that about sums it up. So I'll lock down this discussion.
1300hayabusa Wrote:The artist was not charged,given his photos back and allowed to display.So I reckon that the pics where not as pornographic as people made them out to be and to the eyes of the law they are fine?????????and still classified as art.
classic overreaction imo
kill them muther fu.... pedos, castrate them bastas, string em up............you what? art?
LOL
Volvi Wrote:kill them muther fu.... pedos, castrate them bastas, string em up............you what? art?
LOL
troublemaker
mmm I see it does say closed right up the top there....admins can see it too but we can post.
Maybe we should just delete threads or leave em open...dunno...
In any case I didn't see that...