06-10-2010, 04:57pm
(05-10-2010, 11:38pm)Holeshot Wrote:(05-10-2010, 09:23pm)Dave Wrote: [quote='garbo' pid='227323' dateline='1286186778']
I'll very rarely use the top end on my k8 (if ever) but drool over the 136ft/lb torque. Thats where the bus really rules. Mark
Well F&*%k me, had my 08 on the dyno last week and I was given a graph showing RW HP 174, give or take some, who cares.
The dude reckons that it was a pretty good result compared to other Gen 2 bikes he has dynoed.
So for those who think they are getting 200 RW HP with the additions of slip on's and filter I think some thing must be seriously wrong with the dyno they are using or a lot of drugs are being smoked
Dave
[/quote
Dave, your bike sounds about spot on to me, our K8 shopbike made 173Hp & 101ft/ibs dead std. We tuned up a gen 2 with a BMC filter, full yoshi zorst (can't remember what model) and PC3 = 185hp&106ft/lb. But our dyno ( brand new dynojet 250I) reads a bit lower than some of the others in sth oz. I don't really think 200hp is realistic without opening up the engine.
Garbo did you mean 136 N/M of torque?
200HP from a Gen2 without opening the cases, what are some of you guys on.The numbers above are more like the truth.
A friend of mine has a Gen2 with 179/105 with full yoshi system and Tuning Link mapped P/C. Goes like s#!t of a shovel compared to a Gen1 but it's a long way from 200hp.