17-11-2010, 05:47am
(16-11-2010, 07:32pm)BLACKZOOK Wrote: OK so now (no offence guys) we have two guys who openly have vested interests backing each other up posting negative comments about an inferior product.
One has afiliations with a vendor selling Pazo's the other I'm sure is about to post up an alternative product for sale at a special club discount.
Is someone here going to supply any proof at all that the inferior cast product is dangerous and worse value for money?
Is that not what its all about? "Value for money"?
Prove that the cheap Chinese product is dangerous. If they are unsafe but have sold thousands then where are the complaints on forums about their failures?
You took the words right out of my mouth Bruce.
As soon as I started to read this thread, I started to wonder what the motivation for it was.
I knew it wouldn't take rainbow long to join in and sure enough he did.
And now the latest comment by amcmo, "Finally - No, I will not post pics of our assessment of the competing product. We have processes for evaluating product we consider to be a part of our competitive edge."
Doesn't that sound like a pile of verbal diarrhea.
amcmo, if you won't post photo's of a lever being hit with a hammer in fear of losing your competitive edge, how about you merely post a few links to this "disturbing information" that you have found.