Contact Us
(13-06-2014, 10:03pm)BikerBoy Wrote:(11-06-2014, 11:21pm)Shifu Wrote:(11-06-2014, 11:10pm)BikerBoy Wrote: Was it during the daylight hours or at night? Technically if it was only a visor, I would argue that they give you a wrong infringement. It should not warrant 3 demerit points FFS.
7:09pm daylight savings time. Technically there is no actual law that states absolutely anything about a motorcycle visor. and the fine is excessive! Absolute Robbery!!
That is not even robbery. That is a f*&^ing abuse of power by the prick in a police uniform. Surprised you let it slide like that.
(13-06-2014, 10:03pm)BikerBoy Wrote:(11-06-2014, 11:21pm)Shifu Wrote:(11-06-2014, 11:10pm)BikerBoy Wrote: Was it during the daylight hours or at night? Technically if it was only a visor, I would argue that they give you a wrong infringement. It should not warrant 3 demerit points FFS.
7:09pm daylight savings time. Technically there is no actual law that states absolutely anything about a motorcycle visor. and the fine is excessive! Absolute Robbery!!
That is not even robbery. That is a fu#&ing abuse of power by the pri#k in a police uniform. Surprised you let it slide like that.
7:09pm daylight savings time. Technically there is no actual law that states absolutely anything about a motorcycle visor. and the fine is excessive! Absolute Robbery!!
That is not even robbery. That is a fu#&ing abuse of power by the pri#k in a police uniform. Surprised you let it slide like that.
7:09pm daylight savings time. Technically there is no actual law that states absolutely anything about a motorcycle visor. and the fine is excessive! Absolute Robbery!!
That is not even robbery. That is a fu#&ing abuse of power by the pri#k in a police uniform. Surprised you let it slide like that.
"It is not a shame to not know, the shame is to not know and not to ask"